Prepare for the JD Next Exam with quizzes and tests! Utilize flashcards and multiple choice questions with detailed explanations to boost your readiness. Ace your exam confidently!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Which of the following is NOT a requirement for a valid contract?

  1. Written documentation of the terms

  2. Consideration exchanged between parties

  3. Offer made by one party

  4. Acceptance by the other party

The correct answer is: Written documentation of the terms

A valid contract does not necessarily require written documentation of the terms. While having a written document can provide clarity and serve as evidence of the agreement, many contracts can be valid and enforceable even if they are verbal or implied, as long as the essential elements of a contract are present. For a contract to be valid, it must include consideration, which is something of value exchanged between the parties. This ensures that both sides have an obligation that contributes to the overall agreement. Additionally, there must be a clear offer made by one party and acceptance of that offer by the other party. Written documentation may be beneficial in certain situations, especially for complex agreements or those that fall under specific legal statutes, but it is not a universal requirement for contract validity. Thus, the absence of written documentation does not invalidate a contract as long as the other key elements—consideration, offer, and acceptance—are present and meet legal standards.